Andrew Paquette Finds Cryptographic Algorithms in the Pennsylvania State Board of Elections Voter Registration Data Base
Andrew Paquette Finds Cryptographic Algorithms in the Pennsylvania State Board of Elections Voter Registration Data Base Article Published on Substack by Jerome R. Corsi, Ph.D. Andrew Paquette, Ph.D., has found an algorithm in the Pennsylvania State Board of Elections (SBOE) voter registration database. Having previously found an algorithm in Wisconsin’s SBOE voter registration database, Paquette has no discovered cryptographic formulas embedded in two of the 2020 battleground states. Paquette has now found similar algroithms in a total of seven states: New York, Ohio, Wisconsin, Hawaii, Pennsylvania, as well as Texas and New Jersey (final reports in progress). Paquette stressed the importance of finding these various algorithms: A fundamental rule of database management is that all data should be transparent, traceable, and used only for its intended purpose. The algorithms found in various state databases violate this rule by introducing what amounts to undocumented attributes into the database. This makes it untraceable by normal means and can enable manipulations that violate the intended purpose of the databases. His analysis demonstrated that algorithms are in nine of Pennsylvania’s 67 counties, including Allegheny County (that includes Pittsburgh) and Philadelphia County (that includes the city of Philadelphia): Initial results reveal 115,434 cloned records in Pennsylvania’s current database, a number sufficient to justify ID-tracking algorithms. Nine of Pennsylvania’s 67 counties employ a complex algorithm mapping Legacy ID (LID) number to SBOE ID numbers. Notably, the counties where algorithms are present include Allegheny and Philadelphia counties, which together account for 22.45% of all registrations. Once again, Paquette found thousands of voter records that should be removed but are still present in the SBOE voter registraton database. Pennsylvania’s voter database contains 8,846,634 records, of which only 9,924-19,846 (about 0.11%) are potential clones. These were identified by matching last name, first name, and date of birth – a method aligned with many state election regulations for initial duplicate checks. While this identification method may produce some false positives, the combination of full name and complete birth date sharing is statistically rare. The most common exception involves immigrants with missing birth date information who are assigned default dates. The number of clones in Pennsylvania, while problematic, may not alone justify the implementation of a complex voter tracking algorithm. However, this doesn’t preclude other reasons for such a system: There may be additional suspicious records not identified by this analysis. The system could be preemptively positioned for future use or expansion. Other administrative or operational factors unknown to outside observers might necessitate this complexity. Analysis of Pennsylvania’s voter records revealed several anomalies: 26,453 registrations predate the voter’s birth 29,707 voters with recorded votes before their 15th birthday 85 cases where the last vote date precedes the birth date These anomalies are primarily concentrated in Blair, Dauphin, and Venango counties. Of greater concern are 228,997 active records with no activity since 1/1/2018. Pennsylvania law requires inactive status for voters after missing two successive federal elections. Since 2018, three such elections have occurred (2018, 2020, 2022), meaning these records should be inactive or removed. These outdated active records are mainly found in: Philadelphia: 39,856 Allegheny: 24,065 Montgomery: 12,619 Bucks: 11,170 Delaware: 9,217 Ignoring voter status, 514,422 records show no activity since 1/1/2018. While Pennsylvania lacks a strict removal timeline, federal law allows removal after two federal elections without activity, following an unanswered confirmation notice. The persistence of these records through three election cycles raises questions about list maintenance procedures. Donate to Support God’s Five Stones
Dr. Jerome Corsi’s Writing
Dr. Jerome Corsi Biography and Writing Career Jerome R. Corsi, Ph.D, has worked as a Senior Staff Reporter for WND.com. For over 25 years, Dr. Corsi worked in banking and finance, establishing investment programs for banks in the United States and worldwide to create financial planning services for their retail customers. From 1968-1981, he worked at universities where he conducted research on federally funded grants. In 1981, he published “Terrorism as a Desperate Game: Fear, Bargaining, and Communication in the Terrorist Event” in Journal of Conflict Resolution, a mathematical game-theoretical model for predicting the outcome of terrorist events. This resulted in a top-secret clearance by the State Department’s Agency for International Development. Since 2004, Dr. Corsi has published over 25 books, seven of which were New York Times bestsellers. In 2018, NewsMax published “Killing the Deep State: The Fight to Save President Trump,” a New York Times bestseller. He has written a first-hand account of his experience with the Mueller Office of Special Counsel in his book “Silent No More: How I Became a Political Prisoner of Mueller’s ‘Witch Hunt.’” His most recent book, “Coup d’État: Exposing Deep State Treason and the Plan to Re-Elect President Trump,” was published March 5, 2020. Dr. Corsi graduated magna cum laude with a B.A. in Political Science and Economics from Case Western Reserve University in 1968 and received a Ph.D. in Political Science from Harvard University in 1972. Websites: godsfivestones.com antiglobalistalliance.com thetruthcentral.com Books: The Antiglobalist Manifesto: Ending the War on Humanity The Assassination of President John F. Kennedy: The Final Analysis Who Really Killed Kennedy? How the Coming Global Crash Will Create a Historic Gold Rush Killing the Deep State The Truth about Energy, Global Warming, and Climate Change Silent No More: How I Became a Political Prisoner of Mueller’s ‘’Witch Hunt’’ Minutemen: The Battle to Secure America’s Borders Showdown with Nuclear Iran Why Israel Can’t Wait Atomic Iran America for Sale Partners in Crime: The Clintons’ Scheme to Monetize the White House The Late Great U.S.A.: The Coming Merger With Mexico and Canada Black Gold Stranglehold The Obama Nation The Shroud Codex The Great Oil Conspiracy Bad Samaritans What Went Wrong: The Inside Story of the GOP Debacle of 2012 Hunting Hitler We vote in massive numbers, making the election “TOO BIG TO RIG!” We must make the Democrats’ efforts to steal the 2024 election “TOO CLEAR TO QUEER!” Donate to Support God’s Five Stones
A Winning Strategy to Stop the Democrats from Stealing the 2024 Election
“Too Big to Rig!” “Too Clear to Queer!” A Winning Strategy to Stop the Democrats from Stealing the 2024 Election Article Published on Substack by Jerome R. Corsi, Ph.D. In 2020, the Democrats’ audacious techniques to rig the election in their favor surprised us. In the four years since 2020, diligent investigators have revealed the various methods the Democrats have utilized to steal elections they cannot win in a fair and honest vote. Not only do we make the 2024 election “Too Big to Rig!” by voting en masse, but we also make the Democrats various schemes to steal the 2023 election “Too Clear to Queer!” The ongoing revelation that rogue actors have placed cryptographic algorithms in various state boards of election voter registration databases is particularly alarming. These algorithms allow rogue actors to create, hide, and vote and certify “non-existent voters” (i.e., fictitious people)—a particularly troubling reality. But forewarned is forearmed. In 2024, we must fight back and win. In any state where algorithms or other voting irregularities have been discovered, lawyers must prepare to challenge election processes and procedures immediately, even while the voting is underway. The telltale signs are evident: Weak Democrat candidates begin surging in vote tallies. Board of Election officials halt the counting of votes. A vast number of mail-in ballots suddenly appear. Lawyers must prepare legal challenges in battleground states in advance: Poll watchers must demand the opportunity to conduct field surveillance of mail-in ballots to determine if the voter is an actual person at the address registered with a legal right to vote. The very existence of an algorithm should be a red flag that rogue actors plan to implement fraudulent voting schemes. Lawyers should file voter fraud charges even while counting the votes is in progress. Large numbers of clone voter registrants (i.e., multiple voter registrations for the same voter), registrations without registration dates (or with suspicious dates, such as January 1), or registration dates before the person registered was born are likely targets for use in voter fraud schemes. Why weren’t these records removed from the state voter registration files before the voting started? If Democrats think they can get away with stealing another election without a fight, we must prove them wrong. The critical point is to file legal challenges both with secretaries of state and the boards of election, as well as in the courts that demand proof that all who voted were real people, not algorithms, multiple mail-in votes from clones, or “ghost voters.” We have a right to demand proof that all who vote on November 5, 2024, have a valid registration and a legal right to vote. We vote in massive numbers, making the election “TOO BIG TO RIG!” We must make the Democrats’ efforts to steal the 2024 election “TOO CLEAR TO QUEER!” Donate to Support God’s Five Stones